« Development banana | Home | The car insurance services online »
use of open country
By admin | December 18, 2009
The use of open country conflicts with its preservation. This is just as true for the major city-landscape visions of the past: Ebenezer Howard’s “Garden City,” Frederick Lay Olmsted’s “Suburb,” Frank Lloyd Wright’s “Broadacre City,” Le Corbusier’s “Ville Radieuse,” Ernst May’s “New Frankfurt,” Lewis Mumford’s “Culture of Cities,” and Ludwig Hilbersheimer’s “New Regional Pattern” all had the goal of making the landscape usable for everyday life. In all these schemes, landscape does not function as something autonomous, but instead—and also in today’s concepts for new interurban development regions—as raw material to be transformed into urban landscape. Unlike agriculture, for example, which also changes the landscape beyond recognition in its own way, this type of use is not directly dependent upon its preservation. With the reshaping of landscape into urban greenery, industrial parks, etc., landscape is treated like an exploitable resource, hardly different from coal, oil, or water. It is consumed.
For industry and commerce, landscape that is not marketable for tourism or Irtractive as a living environment is a usable area whose value as a location depends primarily upon the available infrastructure, Landscape in the edges of cities has become a rare commodity; therefore, not only its use but also its preservation has become interesting for the exploitation process. In architecture, landscape has historically—if it was even taken into consideration in the first place— hardly ever been seen as anything other than a panoramic view, Here the approliriation of landscape space is reserved for the contemplation of the privileged or the vanity of architects and developers. The socially motivated concepts of the garden city in the late nineteenth century, the dc-urbanization projects in the early twentieth century, and the socially engaged concepts of public housing of the thirties in the Weimar Republic were all social visions. Today, however, in the development of interurban agglomerations, such visions do not play any role. The stew urban landscape is not a product of a specific design idea, Economic and Istirastructural forces dominate its design process.
Topics: business |